Table of Contents
57th GST Council Meeting: Key Recommendations Explained
A small trader logs in to the GST portal and finds a show cause notice for ₹7,200 of tax. Replying to it will cost him a professional fee, several portal visits and a few sleepless nights. Very often, the cost of defending the notice is higher than the amount in dispute. Lakhs of taxpayers have lived this story since 2017.
The 57th GST Council Meeting, held on 8 October 2026 in New Delhi, tries to fix exactly this kind of problem. The 56th meeting last year dealt with rate rationalisation. This time the Council looked at process: registration, returns, refunds, adjudication, arrest and prosecution. According to the Ministry of Finance release, it recommended omitting the power of arrest, raising the prosecution threshold from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore, relaxing blocked credit and automating refunds.
There is one caution before we go further. These are recommendations. They are not law. Each of them needs an amendment to the Act, a change in the Rules, or a notification or circular before it binds you or helps you. This guide explains every major recommendation of the 57th GST Council Meeting, the provision it touches, what the law says today, and what you should do in the meantime.
1. 57th GST Council Meeting at a Glance
The table below gives the full picture in one place. The sections that follow explain each item in detail.
Area | Recommendation | Provision involved |
Arrest | Complete withdrawal of arrest powers | Section 69, CGST Act |
Prosecution | Threshold raised from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore; offence clauses narrowed; punishments rationalised | Section 132, CGST Act |
Show cause notices | No notice where tax involved is below ₹10,000 | Sections 73, 74, 74A |
Penalties | General penalty cut from ₹25,000 to ₹10,000; 5% reduced penalty in non-fraud cases; minimum penalty of ₹10,000 removed | Sections 125, 73, 74A |
Pre-deposit | Cap of ₹40 crore where an order involves only penalty | Sections 107(6), 112(8) |
Blocked credit | Restrictions removed on several items | Section 17(5) |
ITC refunds | Input services (inverted duty) from 1 November 2026; capital goods over 60 months from 1 April 2027 | Section 54(3) |
Refund process | Automation, 10-day acknowledgement, 90% provisional sanction | Section 54, Rule 89 |
Registration | Auto-acceptance of amendments, auto-cancellation, Rule 14B for small e-commerce sellers | Rules 14B, 19, 21, 21A, 22, 23A |
Returns | IMS changes, correction mechanism, new statements | Rules 60(6A), 61(1A), 61(1B), 86C, 86D |
Goods in transit | Interception only on intelligence and with Joint Commissioner approval | Sections 68, 129, 130 |
Exports | Distinct-person condition removed; place of supply rule changed | Sections 2(6), 13(3)(a), 16(1), IGST Act |
Small taxpayers | Late fee waiver up to ₹5 crore turnover; ARQP concept approved in principle | Sections 39(1), 47 |
ITC blocking | Objection and personal hearing | Rule 86A |
2. Are the 57th GST Council Meeting Recommendations Law Yet?
No. The GST Council is a constitutional body under Article 279A of the Constitution. It makes recommendations. The Ministry of Finance’s own release says that the recommendations will be given effect through circulars, notifications and law amendments, which alone carry the force of law.
The route decides how fast a change reaches you.
Route | What it covers | Typical speed |
Amendment to the CGST, IGST and State GST Acts | Sections 17(5), 54, 69, 73, 74, 74A, 107, 112, 125, 132, 68, 129, 130 and the IGST Act changes | Slowest. Needs Parliament and State Legislatures |
Amendment to the CGST Rules (Section 164) | Rules 14B, 19, 21, 21A, 22, 23A, 60, 61, 86A, 86C, 86D, 89 and the forms | Moderate. Notified by the Government |
Rate and exemption notifications (Sections 9 and 11) | EV transport, delivery services, exemptions, margin scheme clarification | Fast |
Circulars (Section 168) | Registration documents, fraud and suppression guidelines, ISD, Section 17(4) credit, pre-deposit, export payments | Fast |
In practice, this means the law as it stands today continues to apply. Section 69 remains on the statute book, Section 17(5) still blocks credit, and Rule 89(5) still limits refunds on input services. Do not change a filing position on the strength of a press release.
3. Arrest and Prosecution: Sections 69 and 132
What the Law Says Today
Section 69(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 allows the Commissioner to authorise arrest where he has reasons to believe that a person has committed an offence under clause (a), (b), (c) or (d) of Section 132(1) involving more than ₹2 crore. Section 132(5) makes those offences cognizable and non-bailable once the amount exceeds ₹5 crore.
The present punishment structure under Section 132(1) is as follows.
Tax evaded, ITC wrongly availed or refund wrongly taken | Imprisonment up to | Fine |
More than ₹5 crore | 5 years | Yes |
More than ₹2 crore, up to ₹5 crore | 3 years | Yes |
More than ₹1 crore, up to ₹2 crore | 1 year | Yes |
CBIC has also issued guidelines on arrest through Instruction No. 02/2022-23 (GST-Investigation) dated 17 August 2022. The Supreme Court, in Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India (2025), held that the arrest powers under GST are subject to the constitutional and procedural safeguards of criminal procedure.
What the Council Recommended
The Council recommended complete withdrawal of arrest powers by omitting Section 69 of the CGST Act. It also recommended the following changes to prosecution:
- The monetary threshold for prosecution to rise from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore.
- Omission of clause (i) of Section 132(1).
- Deletion of the words “evades tax” from clause (e) of Section 132(1).
- Deletion of the words “or in any other manner deals with” from clause (h) of Section 132(1).
- Amendment of clause (c) so that it covers only fraudulent availment of ITC without receipt of goods or services, or without an invoice or bill.
- Rationalisation of the punishments under Section 132.
What This Means in Practice
The amendment to clause (c) is the most important change for ordinary businesses. Disputes about ITC eligibility, classification or interpretation have often carried the shadow of criminal proceedings. If the clause is narrowed as recommended, the criminal law will be aimed at fake-invoice and no-supply cases, not at disagreements over interpretation.
Two points deserve care. First, the omission of Section 69 does not abolish prosecution. Section 132 continues, and so do the powers of inspection, search, seizure and summons. Second, the release does not say how the revised threshold or the new punishment slabs will treat pending investigations. That will depend on the transitional provisions in the amending law.
4. Notices, Penalties and Appeals: Sections 73, 74, 74A, 107, 112 and 125
Minimum Threshold for Show Cause Notices
The Council recommended amending Sections 73, 74 and 74A to provide that no show cause notice will be issued where the tax involved is less than ₹10,000. The amount is counted by adding CGST, SGST, IGST and cess together. Notices and appeals below that amount, which are pending on the date the provision comes into force, will be decided as if the threshold had always applied.
Example 1. A mismatch between GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B leads to a proposed demand of ₹3,500 CGST and ₹3,500 SGST. The total tax is ₹7,000. Under the recommended threshold, no notice would be issued. If the same demand were ₹12,000, the threshold would not help.
A drafting point to watch: the release uses the words “less than ₹10,000”. Some reports describe the limit as “up to ₹10,000”. The final statutory wording will settle whether a demand of exactly ₹10,000 is covered. Also, the threshold would not waive tax. It only stops the notice. Liability that is genuinely due should still be paid with interest.
Penalty Reforms
Under Sections 73 and 74A, the penalty in non-fraud cases is today 10% of the tax or ₹10,000, whichever is higher. The Council recommended the following:
Item | Present position | Recommendation |
Minimum penalty in non-fraud cases | ₹10,000 | Condition removed |
Penalty if tax and interest are paid after the adjudication order | Full penalty | Reduced penalty of 5% if paid within 30 days (Section 73) or 60 days (Section 74A) of the order |
Penalty where tax, interest and penalty are voluntarily paid in time | Treated as penalty | Deemed to be a “charge” |
General penalty under Section 125 | Up to ₹25,000 | Up to ₹10,000 |
The release does not explain the exact consequence of treating the penalty as a “charge”. The drafting of the amendment will have to be read carefully when it arrives.
Fraud, Wilful Misstatement and Suppression
Section 74 and Section 74A carry a penalty equal to the tax where fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression of facts is alleged, and they allow a longer limitation period. The Council recommended a comprehensive circular covering the quality and timeliness of notices and orders, personal hearings, and the invocation of fraud or suppression only on the merits of each case.
This is a welcome step. The Supreme Court held in Pushpam Pharmaceuticals Co. v. CCE, Bombay (1995) that “suppression” means a deliberate act with intent to evade duty, not mere omission. That judgment arose under the Central Excise Act, but the principle is regularly cited in GST proceedings. In real notice proceedings, a notice that alleges suppression without any evidence of intent is one of the most commonly challenged documents.
Cap on Pre-Deposit in Penalty-Only Appeals
Appeal pre-deposit is governed by Section 107(6) for the first appeal and Section 112(8) for the Tribunal. In general, these are ordinarily capped at ₹25 crore and ₹50 crore respectively under each of the CGST and SGST Acts. The Council recommended an upper limit of ₹40 crore, made up of ₹20 crore under CGST and ₹20 crore under SGST or UTGST, where an order involves only penalty and no demand of tax.
The Council also recommended making Section 115, which deals with interest on refund of pre-deposit, a standalone provision on the rate of interest, along with a clarificatory circular.
Multi-Year Notices
Several High Courts have set aside notices that covered more than one financial year. The Council has recommended a validation clause in the CGST Act for such notices. If enacted, it would affect pending litigation on this point, so taxpayers with such notices should watch the final wording.
5. Input Tax Credit Changes: Sections 16, 17(5) and Rule 86A
Relaxation of Blocked Credit under Section 17(5)
The Council recommended amending Section 17(5) to remove the restriction on ITC on several items. The release uses the words “inter alia”, so the list is not necessarily complete.
Item | How it is blocked today | Practical effect if amended |
Outdoor catering | Section 17(5)(b), subject to its exceptions | Credit available to the recipient |
Health and life insurance | Treated as blocked by many officers | Credit on group policies for employees may become available |
Telecommunication towers and pipelines outside the factory | Outside “plant and machinery” under the Explanation to Section 17 and so blocked under Section 17(5)(c) and (d) | Ends a long-standing dispute for telecom and pipeline businesses |
Free samples | Section 17(5)(h) | Credit for pharmaceutical and consumer goods companies |
Goods destroyed or written off on expiry of shelf life, where required by law | Section 17(5)(h) | Credit where destruction is legally mandatory |
Example 2. A manufacturing company pays 18% GST on a group health insurance policy for its employees. Today, the tax cost is generally absorbed. If the amendment is enacted as recommended, the company may claim the credit, subject to the final conditions. Until then, the credit should not be taken.
Limited Credit on Services Bought and Resold
The Council recommended allowing limited ITC where restaurant and outdoor catering services, hotel accommodation up to ₹7,500 per unit per day, and gym or fitness services are bought and then supplied in the same line of business. The model is the relief already available for passenger transport, tour operator services and renting of motor vehicles. This will be given effect through the rate notifications, and the conditions will matter.
Margin Scheme for Second-Hand Vehicles
The Council recommended a clarification under Notification No. 8/2018-Central Tax (Rate) and the matching IGST and cess notifications. Dealers in second-hand vehicles under the margin scheme may claim ITC on inputs and input services such as spares, repairs, rent, technology and advertising. The restriction applies only to the tax paid on the purchase of the second-hand vehicle itself.
Objection and Hearing on ITC Blocking: Rule 86A
Rule 86A allows an officer to block credit in the electronic credit ledger where he has reasons to believe that it was fraudulently availed or is ineligible. The blocking ceases after one year under sub-rule (3). At present, the Rules give the taxpayer no formal procedure to object. The Council recommended amending Rule 86A to allow an objection and a personal hearing before the proper officer decides. For a business whose working capital is frozen, this is a significant procedural safeguard.
Time Limit under Section 16(4)
The Council recommended amending Sections 16, 37 and 39 to align the time limits for furnishing outward supplies and returns with the time limit for availing ITC under Section 16(4). The detailed drafting is awaited. Meanwhile, the existing deadlines in Section 16(4) continue to apply, and a missed deadline still means loss of credit.
6. Faster and Wider Refunds: Section 54
Refund of ITC on Input Services in Inverted Duty Cases
An inverted duty structure arises when the tax on inputs is higher than the tax on the output supply. A manufacturer buying raw material at 18% and selling the finished product at 5% is a typical case.
At present, the formula in Rule 89(5) works on “inputs”, which means goods. Refund of credit on input services and capital goods is not available in inverted duty cases. In Union of India v. VKC Footsteps India Pvt. Ltd. (decided on 13 September 2021), the Supreme Court upheld the Rule and treated the exclusion as a legislative choice.
The Council recommended amending the proviso to Section 54(3) and the Rules so that accumulated ITC on input services becomes refundable in inverted duty cases. This is proposed for ITC availed on or after 1 November 2026.
Example 3. A manufacturer buys raw material worth ₹50 lakh with GST of ₹9 lakh and sells goods worth ₹60 lakh at 5%, with output tax of ₹3 lakh. It also pays ₹1.2 lakh of GST on freight, repairs and professional services. Assume, for simplicity, that all its turnover is inverted rated. Today the maximum refund works out to about ₹6 lakh (₹9 lakh less ₹3 lakh). The ₹1.2 lakh of ITC on services stays locked in the ledger. Under the recommendation, eligible ITC on services could also enter the computation, so the figure could rise to about ₹7.2 lakh, subject to the final formula.
Refund of ITC on Capital Goods
The Council recommended refund of accumulated ITC on capital goods in cases of zero-rated supplies and inverted duty structure. The refund will be spread over 60 months and will apply to ITC availed on capital goods on or after 1 April 2027.
Example 4. An exporter avails eligible ITC of ₹60 lakh on machinery. If the mechanism spreads the credit equally, ₹1 lakh a month would be considered for refund over 60 months. The actual amount will depend on the formula that is finally prescribed. The ₹1 lakh figure is only an illustration of the arithmetic.
Automation of Refund Processing
The Council recommended system-based processing of refunds of excess cash ledger balance, zero-rated supplies and inverted duty structure in two phases.
Phase | Recommendation |
Phase 1 | Excess cash ledger balance refunded automatically without officer intervention |
Phase 1 | Acknowledgement or deficiency memo within 10 days instead of 15, with deemed acknowledgement if the officer does not act |
Phase 1 | 90% of zero-rated and inverted duty refund claims sanctioned provisionally by the system, on risk evaluation |
Phase 2 | System-based acknowledgement after verification of the application |
Phase 2 | Automated sanction of the full refund on zero-rated supplies after adjusting pending dues, on risk evaluation |
The Council also recommended the following supporting changes:
- FORM GST RFD-01 to capture details in a system-readable format, removing the need to upload scanned documents for zero-rated and inverted duty claims.
- Removal of the cap in Rule 89(4)(C), which restricts the turnover of zero-rated supply of goods to 1.5 times the value of like goods supplied domestically.
- An Explanation to Section 54(14) clarifying that the ₹1,000 minimum refund limit applies to CGST, SGST, UTGST and IGST taken together.
Rule 91 already allows provisional refund of 90% in zero-rated cases. What changes is the automation, the extension to inverted duty cases and the reduced human interface. For exporters, the working-capital effect could be large.
7. Registration Reforms: Rules 14A, 14B, 19, 21, 21A, 22 and 23A
Registration is where many small businesses first run into friction, so the recommendations here deserve attention.
Clearer filing and processing. Under Rule 14A, which came from the 56th meeting, registration is granted automatically where the applicant does not intend to pass on ITC of more than ₹2.5 lakh a month. For the remaining cases, the Council recommended a comprehensive circular listing the documents and information required, with FAQs. It also recommended amending FORM GST REG-01 to add drop-down boxes for the prescribed documents, and a more user-friendly portal interface.
Automatic acceptance of amendments. Rule 19 is proposed to be amended so that amendments to all registration particulars are accepted automatically on the portal, except those relating to the Principal Place of Business. For taxpayers under Rule 14A, even Principal Place of Business changes would be accepted automatically.
Automatic cancellation on the taxpayer’s application. The Council recommended a two-phase approach for FORM GST REG-16.
Phase | Condition for automatic acceptance |
Phase 1 | All pending returns filed and dues paid, and either ITC passed on never exceeded ₹2.5 lakh in any month, or the final return in FORM GSTR-10 was filed within the specified time |
Phase 2 | All applications accepted automatically once pending returns are filed and dues are paid; REG-16 to carry the GSTR-10 details |
Cancellation by the officer. Rule 21 is proposed to be amended to omit certain grounds of cancellation. Rules 21A and 22 are proposed to be amended and a new Rule 23A inserted, to provide for system-based cancellation and revocation based on non-compliance and later compliance. This covers the defaults of not filing returns and not furnishing bank account details, within the specified time.
Small sellers on e-commerce platforms: Rule 14B. The 56th meeting approved this in principle. The 57th recommended inserting Rule 14B. A small supplier of goods through an Electronic Commerce Operator (ECO) may obtain registration in a State where it has no physical presence, by declaring the ECO’s warehouse in that State as its Principal Place of Business. The condition is that the supplier does not intend to pass on ITC of more than ₹2.5 lakh a month, and stock transfers between distinct persons are excluded. Registration would be granted automatically, subject to conditions.
Example 5. A garment seller based in Gujarat sells through an online marketplace. Orders come from customers in several other States, and the platform stores the seller’s goods in its warehouses there. Under Rule 14B, the seller could register in those States using the warehouse as its Principal Place of Business, without taking a shop or office in each State.
8. Returns, IMS and Reconciliation
Mismatch notices and system intimations are one of the biggest sources of litigation. The Council’s package here aims at fixing the mismatch before it becomes a notice. The release lists the following measures.
- Enhancements in FORM GSTR-1, GSTR-1A and IFF, to allow better reconciliation with FORM GSTR-3B.
- A new Rule 86D, creating an “Electronic Statement of tax paid on Reverse charge basis and input tax credit claimed”, to help correct reporting of RCM liability and ITC.
- A new Rule 86C, creating an “Electronic Credit Reversal and Reclaim Statement”, to help report ITC reversed and reclaimed.
- New sub-rules (1A) and (1B) in Rule 61, to allow correction of liability and ITC in FORM GSTR-3B so that they align with GSTR-1/1A/IFF and GSTR-2B respectively.
- A new sub-rule (6A) in Rule 60, under which a recipient may accept, reject or keep pending a document on the Invoice Management System (IMS) for the purpose of FORM GSTR-2B, with conditions including the period for which a credit note can be kept pending.
- Amendment of FORM GST DRC-03, so that the underlying invoice details are declared when payment is made.
- A circular on the correct reporting of ITC and its reversal in FORM GSTR-3B in the context of IMS.
The Council recommended that these provisions apply from the return for April 2027. It also recommended placing the revised mechanism in the public domain for time-bound consultation, with the Union Finance Minister authorised to approve changes based on feedback. So the final design may differ from what is described here.
Until then, ITC in GSTR-3B must continue to be claimed on the basis of the existing law. In my experience of reply drafting, many notices on ITC arise from a simple gap between the GSTR-2B figure and the amount claimed in GSTR-3B. A correction mechanism will help, but reconciling every month will still be the safest practice.
9. Interception of Goods in Transit: Sections 68, 129 and 130
A truck stopped on the highway for hours costs a business money long before any penalty is decided. The Council recommended amendments to Sections 68, 129 and 130 so that:
- A conveyance carrying goods may be intercepted only on specific intelligence and with the authorisation of an officer not below the rank of Joint Commissioner.
- Inspection and further action for detention or seizure may be taken only where the supplier or the recipient is located or registered in the State where the interception is made. There would be no interception in transit States.
- Where no e-way bill has been generated, or the conveyance carries no document showing the origin or destination of the goods, the goods may be inspected, detained or seized irrespective of jurisdiction.
- The confiscation provisions of Section 130 would not apply to goods and conveyances in transit.
The present framework includes Section 68, which requires a person in charge of a conveyance to carry the prescribed documents, and Rule 138B, which provides for verification of documents and conveyances. A transporter should therefore continue to carry the invoice and e-way bill. The relaxation does not help a vehicle that moves without them.
10. Export Reforms under the IGST Act
Four recommendations will matter to exporters of goods and services.
Distinct-person condition removed. Section 2(6)(v) of the IGST Act is proposed to be omitted. This sub-clause requires that the supplier and recipient of services are not merely establishments of a distinct person under Explanation 1 to Section 8, if a supply is to qualify as an export of services. Removing it would help Indian companies that supply services to or through their foreign branches or offices.
Place of supply for services on goods. Section 13(3)(a) is proposed to be omitted. Services performed on goods that the recipient makes physically available to the supplier would then follow the default rule in Section 13(2), which is the location of the recipient.
Example 6. An Indian workshop repairs machinery that belongs to a customer in Germany and that was sent to India for the repair. Today, the place of supply is the place where the services are performed, so the supply is not an export. After the amendment, the place of supply would be the recipient’s location, and the supply could qualify as an export if the remaining conditions of Section 2(6) are met, including payment in convertible foreign exchange or, where the RBI permits, in Indian rupees.
Supplies to overseas buyers delivered in an SEZ or FTWZ. An Explanation is proposed in Section 16(1) of the IGST Act. Where goods are supplied to an overseas buyer but delivered in an SEZ or Free Trade Warehousing Zone, and payment is received in convertible foreign exchange or in Indian rupees where the RBI permits, the supply will be treated as a supply to an SEZ or FTWZ. This gives manufacturers certainty about zero rating.
Circular on payment for exports. A circular is proposed to clarify issues on receipt of payment in foreign exchange or Indian rupees for exports of goods and services.
The Council also recommended omitting Rule 96(10) of the CGST Rules with effect from 23 October 2017, in accordance with a decision of the Supreme Court. A retrospective omission would benefit exporters whose IGST refunds were affected by that sub-rule.
11. Relief for Small Taxpayers
Waiver of Late Fee
The Council recommended a waiver of late fee on delayed returns under Section 39(1) for taxpayers whose turnover in the preceding financial year was up to ₹5 crore. The condition is that the delayed return is filed by the end of the month in which it was due.
Late fee under Section 47 is currently ₹50 a day (₹25 each under CGST and SGST) for a regular return and ₹20 a day for a nil return, subject to the prescribed maximum. Note that the waiver is limited. A return that is filed in the month after the due month will not benefit. Interest under Section 50 on delayed payment of tax is a separate matter, and the release does not suggest relief from it.
Annual Return Quarterly Payment (ARQP)
The Council approved in principle a concept note for an optional ARQP scheme. It is meant for taxpayers with aggregate turnover of up to ₹5 crore in the preceding financial year who supply exclusively to unregistered persons, in other words, B2C suppliers. The idea is to file an annual return while paying tax quarterly. The detailed rules have not been finalised, so existing return obligations continue.
12. Other Legal Amendments Recommended
Beyond the main themes, the release contains several other recommendations. Each of them needs an amending law, a notification or a circular before it applies.
- Intellectual property rights. An amendment to Schedule II of the CGST Act so that transfer of title in IPR, whether temporary or permanent, is uniformly treated as a supply of services.
- E-invoicing. Extension of e-invoicing to domestic supplies received from an unregistered person where tax is payable under reverse charge, and to imports of services, for taxpayers with aggregate annual turnover of ₹5 crore and above.
- ECO liability. An amendment to Section 9(5) to clarify that the ECO is liable to pay tax on the notified services irrespective of its business model.
- Tribunal alignment. Amendments to the CGST Act and the GSTAT (Appointment and Conditions of Service of President and Members) Rules, 2023, to align the GST Appellate Tribunal with the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2026 and the related National Tribunals Commission Rules, 2026.
- Clarifications on the Input Service Distributor mechanism, ITC for banks, financial institutions and NBFCs that opt for Section 17(4), pre-deposit issues, and ITC on demonstration vehicles in certain situations.
13. Rate and Classification Clarifications
The release says that the 56th meeting concentrated on rate rationalisation. The 57th made no general change to the rate slabs. It did, however, include several specific clarifications and rate-related recommendations.
Goods
Item | Recommendation |
Sublimation paper | Classified under heading 4809; past cases regularised on an “as is where is” basis |
Toys | Entries cover all toys under heading 9503, not only tricycles, scooters and pedal cars |
Seaweed extract bio-stimulants | Classified under heading 3101 as fertilisers, if registered under the Fertiliser Control Order; past cases regularised |
Waste and scrap of plastics, e-waste, tyres and used cooking oil | Reverse charge on supply by unregistered to registered persons; 2% TDS on supply between registered persons |
Psyllium seeds (Isabgol) | Nil rate, whether fresh, chilled, frozen or dried |
Re-treaded tractor tyres | Rate aligned with new tractor tyres |
Compensation cess on Canteen Stores Department supplies | Cess not levied for specified past periods exempted |
Services
Item | Recommendation |
Passenger transport and renting of motor vehicles using electric vehicles | Option to pay 5% with restricted ITC, where battery charging cost is included in the consideration |
Delivery services through an ECO | Brought under Section 9(5); 5% without ITC; GTA exemption under Entry 21A not to apply to goods supplied or ordered through an ECO |
Helicopter passenger transport on seat-sharing basis | Exempt from and to airports and helipads in north-eastern States, Sikkim and Bagdogra |
Storage of seeds meant for sowing; curing of coffee; Seamen’s Provident Fund Organisation services | Exempt |
R&D services under Entry 44A | Self-certification by the head of the institution that the activity is R&D and not consultancy |
Import of services by foreign shipping line establishments from related persons, without consideration | Exempt; past period regularised |
Upfront or concession amount to NHAI under the Toll Operate Transfer model | Exempt |
O&M services in TOT highway projects | Special procedure for valuation and time of payment |
Bank Funds Transfer Pricing | Notional amount clarified to be “interest” |
Motor vehicle leasing | Clarification on charges such as registration, road tax, insurance and FASTag recovered from the lessee |
Rate recommendations take effect only through notifications under Sections 9 and 11, so check the notification and its date before applying any of these.
14. Implementation Timeline and Present Status
The release mentions only a few dates. All of them are subject to the necessary amendments.
Date | What is proposed |
1 November 2026 | Refund of accumulated ITC on input services in inverted duty cases, for ITC availed on or after this date |
1 April 2027 | Refund of ITC on capital goods (60-month spread), for ITC availed on or after this date |
Return for April 2027 | Alternate mechanism for amending liability and ITC in returns |
23 October 2017 | Retrospective effect proposed for omission of Rule 96(10) |
As on 19 October 2026, the information available to me shows the Council’s recommendations, the Ministry of Finance release and the FAQs and commentary that followed. I did not find an enacted amendment to the CGST Act giving effect to the omission of Section 69, the ₹5 crore threshold or the Section 17(5) changes. Check CBIC and the GST Council website for notifications before you rely on any item.
15. Impact by Type of Taxpayer
Taxpayer | Most relevant recommendations | What to do now |
Small trader or MSME | ₹10,000 notice threshold, late fee waiver, easier registration changes, lower penalties | Keep filing on time; do not assume small demands are waived |
Manufacturer with inverted duty | Refund on input services and capital goods | Start tracking ITC on services and capital goods separately by date of availment |
Exporter | Faster refunds, Rule 89(4)(C) cap removal, place of supply changes, Rule 96(10) omission | Review contracts with foreign customers and foreign branches |
E-commerce seller | Rule 14B registration, ECO delivery service rate | Map States where you sell and where stock is held |
Transporter | Limits on interception | Carry e-way bill and invoice; the relaxation does not cover missing documents |
Large company | Section 17(5) relaxations, IMS, Rules 86C and 86D, e-invoicing on RCM | Prepare systems for the April 2027 return changes |
Telecom and pipeline businesses | Credit on towers and pipelines | Do not claim until the amendment is notified |
16. Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Treating a Council recommendation as law. Claiming ITC on health insurance or outdoor catering before the amendment is notified invites a demand with interest and penalty.
- Ignoring a small notice. The ₹10,000 threshold is only a recommendation today. Many taxpayers also forget that a notice can cover amounts that look small individually but add up across periods.
- Assuming that arrest powers are already gone. Section 69 is in force until it is omitted. Cooperate with summons and keep records ready.
- Confusing the pre-deposit caps. The ₹40 crore ceiling is proposed only for orders involving penalty alone. Appeals with a tax demand follow the existing pre-deposit rules.
- Mixing up the refund dates. The 1 November 2026 date applies to input services in inverted duty cases, and the 1 April 2027 date applies to capital goods. They are not interchangeable.
- Delaying returns because of the late fee waiver. The relief applies only where the return is filed within the due month, and only up to ₹5 crore turnover. Interest is payable regardless.
- Neglecting reconciliation. The new correction facility will not replace a monthly GSTR-2B check.
If you have already acted on a recommendation, for example by claiming a blocked credit, the safe course is to reverse it with interest through the proper return and seek professional advice before a notice arrives.
17. Action Checklist for Taxpayers
- Keep a note that none of the recommendations applies until it is notified or enacted.
- Continue to apply Section 17(5), Rule 89(5) and Rule 86A as they stand today.
- Track ITC on input services (from 1 November 2026) and capital goods (from 1 April 2027) separately in your books, so that refund claims can be built later.
- Reconcile GSTR-2B with GSTR-3B every month, and clear IMS entries before filing.
- Review pending notices and appeals below ₹10,000 and wait for the transitional provision before closing any reply.
- For exporters, review whether foreign-branch services and repair-type services could become export transactions.
- For e-commerce sellers, list the States where you sell and see whether Rule 14B will suit you.
- Check the CBIC and GST Council websites for notifications, circulars and FAQs on a regular basis.
- Watch the public consultation on the return-correction mechanism and send comments if your business is affected.
- Keep e-way bills, invoices and transport documents with every consignment.
18. Frequently Asked Questions
Q1. Are the recommendations of the 57th GST Council Meeting in force? No. They take effect only through amendments to the Acts, changes in the Rules, notifications and circulars. The Ministry of Finance release says that only these carry the force of law.
Q2. Has the power of arrest under GST been abolished? Not yet. The Council has recommended omitting Section 69 of the CGST Act. Until the Act is amended, Section 69 remains in force. Even after it is omitted, prosecution under Section 132 and the powers of inspection, search, seizure and summons would continue.
Q3. Will no notice be issued for tax demands below ₹10,000? That is the recommendation for Sections 73, 74 and 74A. The amount is counted by adding CGST, SGST, IGST and cess. The proposed law also provides that pending notices and appeals below the threshold will be decided as if the threshold applied. This is still a proposal.
Q4. Can I claim ITC on group health insurance for employees now? Not on the basis of the meeting alone. The Council recommended relaxing Section 17(5), but the amendment and its conditions are awaited.
Q5. From when will refund of ITC on input services in inverted duty cases be allowed? The recommendation applies to ITC availed on or after 1 November 2026, subject to the amendment to Section 54(3) and the Rules.
Q6. Is the late fee already waived for small taxpayers? No. The waiver is recommended for taxpayers with turnover up to ₹5 crore in the preceding financial year, where the delayed return under Section 39(1) is filed by the end of the month in which it was due. It needs to be notified.
Q7. Did the 57th GST Council Meeting change GST rates? There was no general change in rate slabs. The meeting made specific rate and classification recommendations, such as the option of 5% on EV passenger transport and nil rate on psyllium seeds.
Q8. What is the ARQP scheme? It is an optional Annual Return Quarterly Payment scheme for taxpayers with turnover up to ₹5 crore who make only B2C supplies. The Council approved the concept note in principle. The rules are yet to be finalised.
19. Conclusion
The 57th GST Council Meeting has set out a different direction for GST. Where earlier reforms concentrated on rates, this one concentrates on trust, speed and fairness in administration.
The main points to remember are these:
- Section 69 is recommended to be omitted, and the prosecution threshold is recommended to rise from ₹1 crore to ₹5 crore.
- No show cause notice is proposed for tax below ₹10,000, and the general penalty is proposed to fall from ₹25,000 to ₹10,000.
- Blocked credit under Section 17(5) is proposed to be relaxed, and refunds are proposed to cover input services and capital goods.
- Refund processing, registration and return correction are proposed to become largely system-based.
- None of this is law until it is enacted or notified.
One action for today: make a list of the items above that affect your business, and mark the date from which each one can actually be used once notified.
Need professional help with GST compliance, refunds or notice replies? TaxGroww provides GST registration, return filing, refund support and notice-handling services. Contact us at +91 9227092100 or email info@taxgroww.com for personalised guidance.
This article is for general information. It does not constitute advice on any specific case. Please consult a professional before acting on it.
Official Sources
- Ministry of Finance (PIB), Recommendations of the 57th Meeting of the GST Council, Release ID 2320934, 8 October 2026: https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2320934
- GST Council Secretariat press release (October 2026): https://www.gstcouncil.gov.in/sites/default/files/2026-10/press_release.pdf
- CBIC GST notifications and circulars: https://cbic-gst.gov.in
- GST Portal: https://www.gst.gov.in